| Authors | Wylie C. Hembree, Peggy T. Cohen‐Kettenis, Louis Gooren, Sabine E Hannema, Walter J. Meyer, M. Hassan Murad, Stephen M. Rosenthal, Joshua D. Safer, Vin Tangpricha, Guy T’Sjoen |
| Journal | The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI | 10.1210/jc.2017-01658 |
| Citations | 2,205 |
TL;DR
This guideline synthesizes evidence on hormone therapy for gender affirmation in adolescents and adults, providing recommendations for safe and effective regimens to align physical characteristics with one's affirmed gender, while emphasizing multidisciplinary care and careful monitoring for anyone considering self-experimentation with hormones.
This Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline systematically reviewed existing evidence to establish best practices for the endocrine treatment of individuals experiencing gender dysphoria or gender incongruence. The primary "intervention" tested across the synthesized studies was gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), which includes:
The "comparators" were not typically direct placebo controls, as hormone therapy is a desired medical intervention for gender affirmation. Instead, comparisons were often implicit against the natural progression of natal puberty or against different hormone regimens, doses, or routes of administration.
The "outcome measures" investigated across the reviewed literature included:
In essence, the guideline aimed to provide a comprehensive framework for clinicians to safely and effectively manage the endocrine aspects of gender affirmation, focusing on achieving desired physical changes while minimizing health risks.
This guideline is a systematic review and clinical practice guideline, meaning it synthesizes evidence from numerous studies rather than conducting a new one. Therefore, "who was studied" refers to the populations included in the underlying research that informed these recommendations.
The guideline focuses on gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons across different age groups:
The guideline does not specify exact sample sizes, health statuses, or settings for the individuals in the underlying studies, as it draws from a broad range of research. However, the recommendations are generally applicable to individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria or gender incongruence who are seeking medical transition. The guideline also implicitly excludes individuals with conditions that might mimic gender dysphoria (e.g., body dysmorphic disorder) or those for whom hormone treatment would be medically contraindicated without careful evaluation. The recommendations are intended for individuals receiving care from medical and mental health professionals, typically in clinical settings.
As a clinical practice guideline based on a systematic review, the "how they measured it" refers to the methods employed in the original studies that were reviewed, as well as the methodology used by the guideline task force to synthesize this evidence.
In the underlying studies, common measurement instruments and methods included:
Related papers
Chronic Effects of Static Stretching Exercises on Muscle Strength and Power in Healthy Individuals Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review with Multi-level Meta-analysis.
Arntz F, Markov A, Behm DG +5 more · 2023
RCTAerobic exercise increases hippocampal volume in older women with probable mild cognitive impairment: a 6-month randomised controlled trial
Lisanne F. ten Brinke, Niousha Bolandzadeh, Lindsay S. Nagamatsu +4 more · 2014
RCTOtago Home‐Based Strength and Balance Retraining Improves Executive Functioning in Older Fallers: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Teresa Liu‐Ambrose, Meghan G Donaldson, Yasmin Ahamed +5 more · 2008
RCTPhysical Training Improves Motor Performance in People with Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Klaus Hauer, Michael Schwenk, Tania Zieschang +3 more · 2011